The Invisible Man 2020 Blu-ray
Original price was: $19.14.$14.14Current price is: $14.14.
What you can’t see can hurt you. Trapped in a violent, controlling relationship with a wealthy scientist, Cecilia (Elisabeth Moss) escapes in the dead of night and disappears into hiding. But when her abusive ex suddenly dies, Cecilia suspects his death was a hoax. As a series of eerie coincidences turns lethal, threatening the lives of those she loves, Cecilia’s sanity begins to unravel while she desperately tries to prove she is being hunted by someone nobody can see. The Invisible Man 2020 Blu-ray
What you can’t see can hurt you. Trapped in a violent, controlling relationship with a wealthy scientist, Cecilia (Elisabeth Moss) escapes in the dead of night and disappears into hiding. But when her abusive ex suddenly dies, Cecilia suspects his death was a hoax. As a series of eerie coincidences turns lethal, threatening the lives of those she loves, Cecilia’s sanity begins to unravel while she desperately tries to prove she is being hunted by someone nobody can see. The Invisible Man 2020 Blu-ray
Additional information
| Aspect Ratio : | 2.39:1 |
|---|---|
| MPAA rating : | R (Restricted) |
| Product Dimensions : | 0.7 x 7.5 x 5.4 inches; 3.46 ounces |
| Director : | Leigh Whannell |
| Media Format : | 4K, NTSC, Subtitled |
| Run time : | 2 hours and 5 minutes |
| Release date : | May 26, 2020 |
| Actors : | Aldis Hodge, Elisabeth Moss, Harriet Dyer, Michael Dorman, Storm Reid |
| Subtitles: : | French, Spanish |
| Producers : | Jason Blum, Kylie Du Fresne |
| Language : | English (DTS 5.1), English (Dolby Digital 5.1), French (DTS 5.1), French Canadian (Dolby Digital 5.1) |
| Studio : | Universal Pictures Home Entertainment |
| ASIN : | B084Z3WWMB |
| Writers : | Leigh Whannell |
| Number of discs : | 2 |
| Best Sellers Rank: | #3,631 in Blu-ray |
| Customer Reviews: | (98,831) |
15 reviews for The Invisible Man 2020 Blu-ray
You must be logged in to post a review.
Related products
How to Train Your Dragon 3-Movie Collection - Blu-ray + Digital
Kraven The Hunter Blu-ray + Digital
Den of Thieves 2 Pantera 4K + Bluray + Digital
kim Marie –
A movie worth watching
This was a good suspense movie It was kind of scary for sure. I was emotionally invested I liked it
kim Marie –
A movie worth watching
This was a good suspense movie It was kind of scary for sure. I was emotionally invested I liked it
kim Marie –
A movie worth watching
This was a good suspense movie It was kind of scary for sure. I was emotionally invested I liked it
kim Marie –
A movie worth watching
This was a good suspense movie It was kind of scary for sure. I was emotionally invested I liked it
kim Marie –
A movie worth watching
This was a good suspense movie It was kind of scary for sure. I was emotionally invested I liked it
No Pockets –
Worth Buying
I’m a huge Universal Monster fan and I really enjoyed this film.
Joseph Habes –
The reviews for this movie made me think they had done something revolutionary with a classic story
I saw the high reviews for this movie going in and I was really excited, given it had a high 80s with the audience and a low 90s with critics on Rotten Tomatoes. Generally, remakes are not reviewed highly if they simply retell the story, so I thought that a remake getting that high of scores meant they must have done something revolutionary with it.However, as the story moved along, the inconsistencies began piling up, such that I became convinced that there was a big plot twist coming. Big SPOILERS incoming.1. Adrian committed suicide, but somehow they either confirmed that with no body, or he snuck out of the morgue after feigning death and no one noticed. Maybe he paid off the morgue, the funeral home, the cops and the reporters? But that’s so many potential leaks, there’s no way that’s feasible. Especially since he wasn’t really a criminal mastermind. He was a California tech mogul. I don’t know how much power those guys have over the entire justice system, but I don’t think it’s that much.2. Why did her sister, who knew she was coming out of an abusive relationship, completely shut down on her after receiving an email? Something that is very easily faked and very easy to brush off. In the email, she says something like “I never want to see you again. I don’t want to know you.” And then she shows up at the sister’s house…Yet the sister is still convinced she sent the email? What kind of logic is that? She said she didn’t send it and is obviously going through a lot of mental trauma right now. Why not listen to her?3. Why did Sydney think Cecilia hit her? She was basically lying on the ground and the hit came from the side of her head. Sydney would have certainly seen her initiate the strike if that were actually her. The first reaction would have been something like “Ow! Something hit me. Did someone throw something through the window?” not “oh my God, this laying down woman who is my friend that just paid for my entire college education and who has no reason to hit me just hit me! She’s a dangerous maniac!”4. Multiple times, she had her hands on him. Smashing plates over his head, kicking and punching him. She must have known that he didn’t intend to kill her (because if he did, he would have done it ages ago), so there’s no reason to escape him. You have him on the ropes, you pick up a knife and finish him. But maybe she’s too scared from her past trauma with him. Fine.5. She saw that paint will reveal him. Why did she not find new ways to reveal him during those multiple times she got her hands on him? Her lack of preparation is staggering.6. Why did she not use the phone she found in the attic to prove that someone (even if it isn’t Adrian) was spying on her? She couldn’t have faked pictures from over her bed while she was sleeping. At least not without a ton of preparation that cops would not assume she did (like setting up some kind of tripod to take fake stalker photos of herself). That would have been enough proof to at least be taken seriously that someone was stalking her. And that unknown sender with the “surprise” text. Maybe they could have tracked that down somehow?7. Why did she find the suit and then hide it in HIS house? Why not take it? What was she hiding it for? Of course, this comes back in the final moments of the movie, but the only reason she would put it there is if she was preparing the final scene from that point on which, given her fear, I can’t imagine her thinking that far ahead. That suit was concrete proof that would have immediately enacted around the clock surveillance/protection and an investigation into what’s going on.8. When she told her sister about the suit and then her sister sees a floating knife behind her, why is the sister’s response complete horror? The sister is a cop, right? So wouldn’t her immediate response be “Cee! There’s a floating knife behind you!” and flip the table and draw her weapon (if she was carrying it) or something? Why would a cop that, in the previous 20 seconds they said was stronger and harder than even James, be struck with fear to the point of inaction? And why did Cecilia just lift her hand and hold the knife after it was used to kill her sister? Her hand was down. And then her sister is killed and she raises her hand and “catches” the knife, almost in the exact place that it had been floating. That doesn’t make any sense at all.9. As she is being arrested she claims she can “see” him, even though we can clearly see she can’t. She’s staring at where he might be standing, sure. But there’s nothing that would tell her that other than a boiling over of fear and paranoia.There are many other inconsistencies in the movie past that point, like how did Tom hide in her room at the asylum while also being the lawyer at her meeting? Surely she was escorted directly from that meeting back to her cell, so when did he have time to leave the meeting, put the suit on and go back in there? Or maybe that wasn’t Tom in there, but Adrian, in which case I ask, did they find the second suit? Or is there a third suit? How many suits did he make and did he somehow just lose track of the one she hid? Then there’s the question of how he was stabbed with a pen multiple times and still totally fine to restrain her, attack guards etc. Plus the question of how a suit made of cameras doesn’t make any noise when you move (and, more to the point, hides all sounds you make as a relatively large man walking around) and how using pepper spray on it would actually do anything to him, but past inconsistency #9, I had come to a very concrete conclusion:Cecilia is suffering from PTSD and and we were following an unreliable narrator. We were seeing the world through Cecilia’s eyes and seeing the PTSD and hallucinations that come with it. She did send the email. She did hit Sydney. She did not find that phone or anything else in the attic. She did kill her sister and the fights she got into with Adrian were all in her head. She had created some sort of alternate personality or alternate perception of the world that allowed her to do these things without knowing or recognizing she did them, and then fabricating the story of Adrian terrorizing her to back it all up.It could have been a really powerful message about the trauma and psychological side effects of being in an abusive relationship, even after you escape it and the threat is over (as he is dead).But no. They then reveal that it was just a big con job and the brother was in on it with Adrian etc etc. Rather than have a twist, which the bread crumbs were subtly leading to, they revert back to the predictable and safe ending.Now, I’m not one of these people shouting “Oh man, this is a feminist propaganda movie!” I didn’t actually get any political agenda at all from this movie. Maybe they were leading me down the path to intentionally make me start doubting that she was telling the truth and if that’s the case, then they succeeded in that. Although, giving us her perspective and showing us very clearly that she wasn’t doing it would make me doubt that was their intention. Even still ending it with a very wholesome “and we caught the bad guy and she was right all along” is not exactly ground breaking and it did not meet my expectations of a movie with such good reviews.When taken at face value, it was a good suspense thriller of an abusive relationship with the woman taking revenge at the end. But that isn’t new or interesting. Maybe I just expected too much from a mostly typical thriller movie.
15 people found this helpful
DavesNotHereMan –
Much more thriller than horror
This film clearly endeavors to be a modern twist on the original Invisible Man theme, although it pretty much shares the name only as it diverges wildly from the story by Ralph Ellison. A solid thriller here, with some gory scenes. I couldn’t help thinking there were missed opportunities for serious jump scares, I started coming up with them as it progressed. They could have (and really should have) used this horror movie standard to much better creepy effect. Instead they took the high road and went for a more psychological suspenseful thrill ride, which is effective, but for me, it was a bunch of suspenseful appetizers with no truly scary main course. The concept alone is more than enough foundation, a malevolent sociopathic narcissist with a penchant for murder, that can hide completely in plain sight is scary on its own. He has an agenda, to win back the woman he lost at any and all cost, and the child she will have. Had they used the disjointed voice better, or pulled out the stops on the ghostly stalking elements, this might have been a much more memorable film. As it is, it’s good…might have been awesome.
Sebastian andres alarcon lopez –
buena pelicula, llego sin problemas.
buena pelicula, llego sin problemas.
Kim Weekley –
Don’t believe the bad reviews
There’s nothing “woke” about this movie. If you think it is, it’s because you want it to be. A few reviews that said this movie was woke mentioned things that weren’t in the movie at all. There’s no talk of abortion, no white oppression, all white males are NOT shown to be insensitive, etc. So to those reviewers…. Maybe stop being so sensitive and offended that you can’t even see what the movie is actually about. The problem is you, not the movie. With that said, the movie was pretty good but could have been great if it had went in a different direction. Personally, I think the movie would have been better if the “invisible” man would have done something other than stalking an ex. Like create panic and mayhem by doing crazy things in public, or murdering innocent people in broad daylight. BUT the way this plot was handled was pretty damn good. Generic, in a way, but done well. I say generic because the whole “everyone thinks she’s crazy but she really isn’t” trope has been done before over and over again. The ending was the best part. I won’t say what happens but it wasn’t what I expected. Worth a watch.
3 people found this helpful
TNgrL –
A Slow Burn Thriller that Gets Better Towards the End.
The previews to this movie gave me higher hopes for it than what it actually delivered. I would consider this a slow burn thriller. It definitely wasn’t horror although there are a couple of moderately bloody scenes. The acting was good for the most part and cinematography too. I just felt a little let down considering they had such a great concept and felt like it could really take you on a great roller coaster ride of thrills and jumps scares and plot twists, unfortunately ,”The Invisible Man”, just didn’t do that for me. I honestly felt as if the first 30 minutes kind of dragged you along endlessly. Just when I thought it was a bust, the film picked up its tempo and made me want to hang around for the ending. Since I paid $20.00 for it, I intend to watch it again just so I can get my money’s worth and hope I get more out of it next time. Who knows, maybe I will put it on the living room TV and invite the hubby and grown children to watch and charge admission. Lol
3 people found this helpful
B. Sullivan –
A good thriller and what’s with all the comments about domestic violence and being PC?
This is 2020 version is an interesting update of The Invisible Man in terms of technology. And as for it being criticized for somehow advancing a liberal agenda? Wow, that’s a stretch. Thriller/horror movies are full of stories of male violence against women, so how can this be a “political statement” story? If anything, it’s a revenge story, which is also a really common theme. There are a couple of twists in this version of The Invisible Man that also make it worth watching.As for this being somehow objectionable because it depicts domestic violence, I was in an abusive relationship for 11 years before I got free, and I can tell you, one of the worst things that happens is nobody believes you unless you have physical injuries.There are abusers who never hit their victims, but gradually control their victim’s life, confuse them (“gaslight” them, make them think they are the crazy one), isolate them, take over their finances, make them constantly afraid, etc. until, as Cecelia says, “There’s nothing left to take.”My abuser looks like a young minister, is very intelligent, soft-spoken and articulate, goes to church, is so polite… until he’s alone with me, or now, whoever his new victim is – I hope she wakes up more quickly than I did. I have no doubt that if my abuser hadn’t found someone more pliable – I finally started to stand up to him, which is why he left – if he was still here, he was perfectly capable of putting a pillow over my face while I was sleeping. At the end, he kept trying to convince me to get life insurance. Yeah, that’s pretty cliche, but this wasn’t a movie. I am glad I lived to tell the tale. People who make light of domestic abuse in these reviews should be ashamed of themselves.
11 people found this helpful
Ms. M –
A solid thriller
I had to write a review simply because of the ridiculous 1-star reviews claiming the movie is somehow “PC.” I’m guessing a lot of thin skinned, delicate snowflakes just can’t handle the fact that two of the main characters are Black? Or that the lead character actually fights back against an abusive man? I can’t think of how else a person could walk away from this film thinking Hollywood is trying to plant PC messages in your brain. There are literally ZERO politics in this film. It’s a good, solid thriller — that’s it.As for those who say that Elizabeth Moss is below average in attractiveness, PLEASE. In one breath you complain about the Hollywood elite, in another you sound like the exact type that Hollywood traditionally caters to: people who can’t stand to see anyone less than a Barbie or Ken doll come to life on the big screen. Which do you want? A Hollywood that speaks to real people, or one that speaks only to itself? You can’t have it both ways.Okay, rant over.The movie itself was very well done. Not a horror movie, but a good thriller that was engaging from start to finish and had enough moments of surprise to make it not seem formulaic. It’s not going to win any awards, but it was a VERY good movie and I highly recommend it to anyone who doesn’t get their fragile feelings hurt watching white people and Black people be friends on screen, or watching a smart woman deal with an abusive man.
8 people found this helpful
Dennis F. Galletta –
Good movie and great acting
Elizabeth Moss really made this one! She is tops!
kim Marie –
A movie worth watching
This was a good suspense movie It was kind of scary for sure. I was emotionally invested I liked it