video-section-banner-image

Man with No Past 2025

Man With No Past (2025) is a sci‑fi action‑thriller directed by James Bamford, starring Adam Woodward as Ryder—the titular “man with no past”—alongside Jon Voight, Marton Csokas, Charlotte Vega, and Charlotte Weston. Ryder wakes up in an unknown city with amnesia, piecing together fractured memories spanning different eras and facing a clandestine underworld linked to his lost identity.📝 Critics Mixed to negative reviews from critics; audience reception also divided on platforms like IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes: Rotten Tomatoes: 3 critic reviews: praise for its ambition and action aesthetics, criticism for being “too tedious,” “haphazardly constructed,” and “unintentionally hilarious”. Critics: Cinema Crazed: A “solid mid-range action drama” with decent looks. Loud and Clear Reviews: Ambitious premise undermined by repetition and lack of focus. MovieWeb: Described it as “painfully wooden and repetitive,” criticizing weak action and dialogue. Audience (IMDb): Mixed ratings around 4–6/10; some appreciate the concept, others criticize the confusing plot:“This movie has an interesting concept… takes forever to get there and could’ve been a lot sharper” – hampersnow‑41369“Well worth watching… Adam Woodward carries himself… predictable ending” – praqoon, 6/10“A bad movie with Jon Voight… can’t believe he’s Angelina Jolie’s father!” – Dan B🎥 Is It Worth Watching? If you enjoy low‑budget sci‑fi thrillers or amnesia/time‑loop narratives, Man With No Past offers potential through its layered concept, visuals, and performances. But be warned: it’s uneven, often repetitive, and may feel more puzzling than thrilling. It might best serve as casual background viewing rather than a gripping cinematic experience.📺 Where to Watch Available to rent/buy now via digital VOD (YouTube, Amazon Video, Google Play, Apple TV).🎬 Man With No Past (2025) — Conclusion Man With No Past is a low-to-mid-budget sci-fi action thriller that offers a mysterious premise—an amnesiac man uncovering his identity across fragmented timelines. Despite solid performances (notably from Adam Woodward and Charlotte Vega) and stylish cinematography, the film is held back by weak dialogue, a repetitive structure, and underwhelming action. Critics were largely underwhelmed, and audience reactions are mixed. It may appeal to fans of moody, cerebral thrillers—but for most viewers, it's a forgettable entry in the genre. ✅ Watch it if you like: Neo-noir mysteries Sci-fi thrillers with philosophical undercurrents Stories about memory, identity, and time🚫 Skip it if you expect: High production value Clear narrative structure Strong pacing and actionFinal verdict: A stylish but flawed mystery that never quite lives up to its potential.

  • 2025
  • 1 h : 42 min
  • 203 views
  • 4.125
  • R
  • English (Canada)
Not Rated Yet
Add Review

You have to Sign In to share the review